Healthcare Policy, 12(3) February 2017: 95-108.doi:10.12927/hcpol.2017.25024
Background: Costing studies are useful to measure the economic burden of cancer. Comparing costs between healthcare systems can inform evaluation, development or modification of cancer care policies.
Objectives: To estimate and compare cancer costs in British Columbia and Ontario from the payers' perspectives.
Methods: Using linked cancer registry and administrative data, and standardized costing methodology and analyses, we estimated costs for 21 cancer sites by phase of care to determine potential differences between provinces.
Results: Overall, costs were higher in Ontario. Costs were highest in the initial post-diagnosis and pre-death phases and lowest in the pre-diagnosis and continuing phases, and generally higher for brain cancer and multiple myeloma, and lower for melanoma. Hospitalization was the major cost category. Costs for physician services and diagnostic tests differed the most between provinces.
Conclusions: The standardization of data and costing methodology is challenging, but it enables interprovincial and international comparative costing analyses.
This article is for subscribers only.
To view the entire article, sign in if you are a subscriber. Or select one of the options below.
Personal Subscriber? Sign In
Please note: To register for an event you must sign-in as an individual or create a personal Longwood's account. Thank you.
Be the first to comment on this!Please Sign In or Create an Account to add comments