HealthcarePapers, 12(4) December 2012: 31-36.doi:10.12927/hcpap.2013.23221
Commentary
A "Nudge" at All? The Jury Is Still Out on Financial Health Incentives
Marc Mitchell and Guy Faulkner
Abstract
A comprehensive, multi-level approach to curb chronic disease–related costs in Canada is needed. One target for intervention is the economic domain. The emergence of user financial incentives (UFI) in public health policy as well as their broad implementation in corporate settings has stimulated a growing but limited body of research in this area. The authors' position is that the jury is still out on the question of their effectiveness in sustaining long-term health behaviour change, given the nature of the UFI that have been designed and delivered to date – that is, UFI with limited theoretical and contextual consideration. It is their contention that manipulating UFI design features (there are seven core features with a range of attributes) to exploit contextual (e.g., personal income) and theoretical (e.g., self-efficacy) factors may optimize UFI effectiveness over the long term. Although UFI are not the solution, they might very well be a part.
This article is for subscribers only.
To view the entire article, sign in if you are a subscriber. Or select one of the options below.
Personal Subscriber? Sign In
Please note: To register for an event you must sign-in as an individual or create a personal Longwood's account. Thank you.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this!
You must sign in to comment Sign In or Create an Account to add comments
Related Content
ElectronicHealthcare
HealthcarePapers
Transformational Change: Short-Term Gain for Long-Term Pain?
HealthcarePapers
Nudging and Not Nudging: The Difference Doesn't Matter