Law & Governance, 15(2) June 2011
Research Paper
Canadian Political Science and Medicare: Six Decades of Inquiry
Michael A. O'Neill, Dylan McGuinty and Bryan Teskey
Abstract
[This article was originally published in Healthcare Policy 6(4)]
Based on an extensive sample of the literature, this critical review dissects the principal themes that have animated the Canadian political science profession on the topic of medicare. The review considers the coincidence of economic eras and how these are reflected in the methodological approaches to the study of medicare. As is to be expected, most of the scholarly activity coincides with the economic era marked by fiscal restraint and decreases in social investments (1993–2003). At the same time, the review notes the prevalence of institutionalism as an approach to the topic and the scholarly community's near-consensus on medicare as a defining characteristic of the country and its people.
This article is for subscribers only.
To view the entire article, sign in if you are a subscriber. Or select one of the options below.
Personal Subscriber? Sign In
Please note: To register for an event you must sign-in as an individual or create a personal Longwood's account. Thank you.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this!
You must sign in to comment Sign In or Create an Account to add comments
Related Content
HealthcarePapers
HealthcarePapers
Why UFI Nudges Will Get Stuck in the Policy Process
HealthcarePapers
To Nudge or Not to Nudge – That Is Not the Question





