Law & Governance, 15(2) June 2011

Research Paper

Canadian Political Science and Medicare: Six Decades of Inquiry     

Michael A. O'Neill, Dylan McGuinty and Bryan Teskey

Abstract

[This article was originally published in Healthcare Policy 6(4)]

 

Based on an extensive sample of the literature, this critical review dissects the principal themes that have animated the Canadian political science profession on the topic of medicare. The review considers the coincidence of economic eras and how these are reflected in the methodological approaches to the study of medicare. As is to be expected, most of the scholarly activity coincides with the economic era marked by fiscal restraint and decreases in social investments (1993–2003). At the same time, the review notes the prevalence of institutionalism as an approach to the topic and the scholarly community's near-consensus on medicare as a defining characteristic of the country and its people.

 

This article is for subscribers only.
To view the entire article, sign in if you are a subscriber. Or select one of the options below.

 

Personal Subscriber? Sign In


     Remember Me

     

    Please note: To register for an event you must sign-in as an individual or create a personal Longwood's account. Thank you.

     

    Purchase this article.


    Instant access to the full text and PDF of this article.

    Price: $15.50

     

    Purchase entire issue.


    Law & Governance, 15(2) June 2011

    Instant access to the full text and PDFs of this issue.

    Price: $272.00

     


    Comments

    Be the first to comment on this!

    You must sign in to comment Sign In or Create an Account to add comments
     

     

    Related Content

    HealthcarePapers

    A Tale of Two Perspectives

     

    HealthcarePapers

    Why UFI Nudges Will Get Stuck in the Policy Process

     

    HealthcarePapers

    To Nudge or Not to Nudge – That Is Not the Question