HealthcarePapers, 22(3) January 2025: 63-67.doi:10.12927/hcpap.2025.27536
Commentary
Jane Philpott and Duncan Sinclair
Abstract
In “Medicare Makeover: Reimagining the Canada Health Act at 40,” Flood and Thomas (2025) study access and comprehensiveness in the Canada Health Act (1985). They note a decline in timely access to care and advocate for the establishment of benchmarks for access, suggesting provinces should meet those standards in exchange for federal funding. They call for a re-evaluation of what constitutes “medically necessary” services, proposing a broader list of supports while ensuring equitable access regardless of financial status. Building on their recommendations, we argue for deeper systemic reform to Canadian medicare. Collaborative care models and decision making by local teams will enhance service delivery and outcomes. We also expand on the process for determining insured services, including a multi-government task force and public consultation. We suggest that proactive measures should be implemented immediately while advocating for a stronger legislative framework as proposed by Flood and Thomas to ensure the sustainability of Canadian medicare.
This article is for subscribers only.
To view the entire article, sign in if you are a subscriber. Or select one of the options below.
Personal Subscriber? Sign In
Please note: To register for an event you must sign-in as an individual or create a personal Longwood's account. Thank you.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this!
You must sign in to comment Sign In or Create an Account to add comments
Related Content
HealthcarePapers
Systemic Anti-Blackness and Racism in Healthcare: A European Perspective
Healthcare Policy
How Good Reforms Fail: The Warning Example of Alberta’s Borderless EMS System
Nursing Leadership





