Methods: Participants in this study were community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries living in New York City who were over the age of 70 and voluntarily agreed to participate. In order to be eligible for the study, participants had to report difficulties with at least one, but no more than three, of the four domains of physical function: upper extremity, lower extremity, instrumental activities of daily living and activities of daily living. The level of disability was determined through self-report. Participants who reported difficulty in either an instrumental activity of daily living or an activity of daily living were considered to have a disability. Vision ability was tested three times. The same measurement tool (reading card) was used to test vision levels; and for each test, the participant was required to identify letters of the alphabet at varying sizes. During the first test, vision was tested under the regular lighting in the participants' home while the participant wore their usual reading correction (e.g. reading glasses). In the second test, participants read the card while a device increased the light around the letters on the tool, which the researchers labeled "standard lighting". The third test determined the visual ability the participant would have if their eye condition was corrected. This test asked participants to read the card while looking through a device that is designed to assess the ability of the eye to see if there were no diseases present. This device improves vision for some individuals with correctable eye disease, including cataracts.

Findings: This study tested the vision of 299 adults between the ages of 70 and 99. The proportion of individuals with 20/20 vision under the regular lighting in their home was 1%, under standard lighting it was 5.4%, and after correcting for eye disease it was 13%. When standard lighting was used to test vision, 63% of participants had improved vision - more than two lines on the letter card. In addition, in 85% of participants their vision improved when viewing the card through the device which corrects for eye disease compared to the test under regular lighting with regular vision correction. This same improvement was present for 60% of participants compared to the standard lighting test. Participants who reported self-care disabilities (16.4%) had significantly poorer visual ability under the regular lighting in their home than participants who did not report self-care disability. The researchers suggest that selfcare disability may improve if lighting in the home improved to standard lighting conditions and if the individuals received treatment for correctable eye conditions.

Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that when the lighting in the homes of communitydwelling older people was improved, the majority of participants had improved vision. Additionally, the majority of participants could potentially see better if eye disease was corrected. Improvement of vision may lower the rate of self-care disability rates among community-dwelling older people.

Reference: Albert SM, Bear-Lehman J, Burkhardt A. "Disparities between ambient, standard lighting and retinal acuities in community-dwelling older people: Implications for disability." Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2006;54:1713-1718.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this!