Law & Governance
Law & Governance
8(2) April 2008
: 45-47
Abstract
[This article was originally published in HealthcarePapers, Volume 8, Number 2.]
Despite the prevailing opinion and consensus around how primary healthcare systems should be changed, there is very little agreement on how this should happen and a surprising paucity of research and evaluative evidence related to both system organization and mechanisms for change. The authors reflect on Ontario's experience with primary healthcare renewal and provide insight into lessons learned.
Despite the prevailing opinion and consensus around how primary healthcare systems should be changed, there is very little agreement on how this should happen and a surprising paucity of research and evaluative evidence related to both system organization and mechanisms for change. The authors reflect on Ontario's experience with primary healthcare renewal and provide insight into lessons learned.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this!
This article is for subscribers only. To view the entire article
Note: Please enter a display name. Your email address will not be publically displayed