World Health & Population

World Health & Population 12(2) December 2010 : 18-22.doi:10.12927/whp.2013.22073

Environmental Health Assessment of Primary Schools in Southeastern Nigeria: Implication for a Healthy School Environment in Developing Countries

Chinonyelum Thecla Ezeonu and M. N. Anyansi

Abstract

In this cross-sectional descriptive study, we used a validated school health program evaluation scale (SHPE) to assess the environmental health status of primary schools in Ebonyi State, southeastern Nigeria. Parameters assessed included water supply, sewage and refuse disposal, school building ventilation, lighting and seating, as well as the availability of toilet tissue, basins for washing hands, regular cleaning of toilets, and so forth. Of all the schools assessed, only two schools, both private, attained the minimum acceptable SHPE score of 57. The mean SHPE score of the private schools (50.40) was significantly higher than that of the public schools (28.69) (t-test, p = public than in private schools.00). Policy reforms are needed that would ensure a healthy primary school environment in Nigeria and in other developing countries with similar settings.

Introduction

A healthy school environment has been defined as "the physical, emotional and social climate of the school designed to provide a safe physical plant, as well as a healthy and supportive environment that fosters learning" (Marx and Wooley 1998). Some studies have shown a clear link between environmental quality and educational performance (Kamarrudin et al. 2009; Murray et al. 2007). In Nigeria, the universal basic education (UBE) program was passed into law in 2004 as one of the strategies aimed at implementing the educational components of the Millennium Development Goals (Ejieh 2009). The UBE has thus enabled mass enrolment of children in schools, particularly public schools. However, schools ought to be adequately equipped with corresponding infrastructures to provide an enabling school environment for optimal learning for the child.

Earlier studies that assessed the state of the school environment in some parts of Nigeria noted that conditions were generally grossly suboptimal (Nwana 1988; Ofovwe and Ofili 2007). This situation is common in most rural and suburban schools in developing countries, particularly in Africa and Asia (Majra and Gur 2010). Findings such as these have policy implications and necessitate the institution of major reforms in the primary educational system. In most parts of Nigeria, as in other developing countries, such educational reforms are yet to be effected because of a dearth of baseline data on school environmental health assessments. In Ebonyi State, a relatively new state in southeastern Nigeria, no such study has yet been carried out. It is our aim to conduct environmental health assessments of primary schools within the Ebonyi State capital, with the view to highlighting the need for policy reform that would ensure a healthy school environment in Nigeria and in other developing countries with similar settings.

Materials and Method

This study was conducted in Abakaliki, the capital city of Ebonyi State, southeastern Nigeria, from January 2007 to June 2007 and involved 31 primary schools in the study area. Sixteen were run by the government (public schools), and fifteen were privately owned. It was a cross-sectional descriptive study of all the primary schools within the study area, using a validated school health program evaluation scale (SHPE) (Akani 1997). The scale evaluates three aspects of the school health program: school health services, school health instruction and healthful school environment. The maximum score attainable from the scale was 66, and the minimum acceptable score was 57. Study approval was obtained from the Chairperson of the Ebonyi State Universal Basic Education Board for the public schools, and from the Chairperson of the National Association of Private School Proprietors, Ebonyi State chapter, for the private schools. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Ethics Committee of Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria. Data were analyzed using SPSS Version 13. Results from the public schools were compared with those of the private schools, using the independent sample t-test. Level of significance was set at a p-value of < .05 and the confidence level at 95%.

Results

Of the 31 primary schools assessed, the ratio of male to female pupils was 1:1.07. The mean ratio of teachers to pupils was 1:25 in the public schools and 1:20 in the private schools. None of the public schools had pipe-borne water, 56.3% had wells and 25% had access to bore holes, while the rest had no water supply at all. Of the private schools, 60% had pipe-borne water, while 33.3% had bore holes. All the private schools' source of water was within the school. For refuse disposal, the majority of schools (61.3%) practised open dumping, although this was significantly more common in public than in private schools (p = .1). No toilet was available in 56.3% of public schools, and their sewage disposal was the bush method. Pit latrines or toilets were used in 25% and 18.8% of public schools, respectively (Table 1). For the majority of schools with toilets, the ratio was one toilet to ninety pupils (1:90). In private schools, 73.3% had toilets, while the rest had pit latrines. In those with toilets, the ratio of toilets to students was 1:90, just as in the public schools. One school had a lower ratio: one toilet to 30 pupils.


Table 1. Distribution of types of sewage disposal in the private and public primary schools in Abakaliki southeastern Nigeria
  Sewage disposal method  
  Bush Pit Toilet Total
Public schools        
  Number 9 4 3 16
  % within type of school 56.3% 25.0% 18.8% 100.0%
Private schools        
  Number 0 4 11 15
  % within type of school 0% 26.7% 73.3% 100.0%
Total        
  Number 9 8 14 31
  % within type of school 29.0% 25.8% 45.2% 100.0%

 

Among the public schools, 31.3% had dilapidated buildings, while none of the private schools' building were dilapidated. There was 100% sitting comfort (which means every pupil or teacher has a seat to him- or herself) in the private schools, but less for the public schools. A sports field was available in 87.5% of the public schools, but only 25% of the public schools had sports facilities. All the private schools had a sports field, and 80% of the private schools had sports facilities. The difference was statistically significant.

Toilet rolls and soap were not available in 87.5% of the public schools, whereas a majority of the private schools provided these toiletries (p < .05). Toilets were cleaned regularly in 87.7% of the private schools and in 31.3% of the public schools (p = .002). None of the public schools had a safety patrol team or a fire extinguisher, whereas 80% of the private schools had a safety patrol team and 26.7% had a fire extinguisher (p = .00). Compulsory wearing of shoes was noted in all the private schools but only in 62.5% of the public schools (p = .00). Only two schools scored above 57 on the SHPE, and those were private. Comparison of the mean scores of the public (28.69) and the private schools (50.40) using the independent t-test showed a significant difference (p = .00) (Table 2).


Table 2. A comparison of the mean school health programme evaluation scale scores in public and private primary schools in Abakaliki southeastern Nigeria
  Number Mean SD SEM
HSE total score        
  Public schools 16 28.69 5.606 1.402
  Private schools 15 50.40 7.079 1.828
HSE = healthful school environment; SD = standard deviation; SEM = standard error of the mean.

 

Discussion

The situation analysis in the present study shows a deplorable state of the school environment, and it was worse in the public schools. None of the public schools had a water source within the school, and a majority had no adequate means of sewage disposal. In contrast, most of the private schools got their water from taps or bore holes, and their means of sewage disposal were predominantly toilets. Our analysis found that most of the schools with toilets had just one for to up to ninety pupils. This constitutes an over-use of the sanitary facilities and a strain on maintenance. Although the guidelines for establishing schools in various states in Nigeria specify a ratio of one toilet to ten pupils, they seem to exist only on paper (Adia 2010). This is a common occurrence in most parts of Nigeria (Ekpo et al. 2008, Ogaji 2006) and is similar in many parts of the developing world (Majra and Gur 2010). Water, toilet tissue, soap and basins for washing hands are necessities for basic sanitation. It appeared that most of the private schools had obtained these items through contributions from pupils or through school fees. Thus, inadequate government funding of contributes to poor health in public schools and constitutes a major policy issue that should be considered an interventional priority.

Open dumping of refuse, found commonly in most of the schools studied, constitutes environmental pollution. These poor environmental sanitation indices do not seem peculiar to this study area. Other authors who surveyed environmental health knowledge and practice in different schools found similarly poor school environmental sanitation, despite sound knowledge of what constitutes ideal sanitation behaviour (Ebong 1994). Suffice it to note that environmental sanitation is a key element of the Millennium Development Goals under the theme "Ensuring Environmental Sustainability" by 2015. It has been reported that less than 50% of the Nigerian people have access to minimum national acceptable standard of sanitation, and in some states the number is as low as 10%, worse still in some rural settings (Oluyole 2010). Most childhood diseases can be traced back to lack of access to basic sanitation facilities.

As for the school buildings, none of the private schools were dilapidated, whereas 31.3% of the public schools were. This finding did not correlate with the age of the school. Dilapidated buildings put pupils at risk, as such buildings may collapse. In addition, it has been documented that with poor conditions of school buildings, students could be expected to reflect the negative environment in poor academic performance (Kamaruddin et al. 2009). Another area of contrast was seating. All the private schools had 100% comfortable seating for pupils and teachers, while the converse was the case for the public schools. Although the conditions at the middle and high school level in Nigeria are relatively better than those in primary schools, they are still far from optimal.

It is recommended that the governments of developing countries consider implementing policy reforms that would ensure a healthy primary school environment. In conclusion, school age children in the developing world deserve good health in all aspects. To achieve this, and to meet the MDGs of improving child health and environmental sustainability, the concerted efforts of both public and private sectors are imperative.

About the Author(s)

C.T. Ezeonu, MBBS, FMC, Department of Paediatrics, Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Nigeria

M.N. Anyansi, B.Sc, Nurse Public Health, Department of Nursing Sciences, Ebonyi State University, Abakaliki, Nigeria

Correspondence may be directed to: Dr. Chinonyelum Thecla Ezeonu, Consultant Paediatrician and Lecturer, Department of Paediatrics, Ebonyi State University Teaching Hospital Abakaliki, Nigeria, E-mail: ctezeonu@yahoo.co.uk.

Acknowledgment

We are most grateful to Drs. C.J. Uneke, O.U.J. Umeorah and F.N. Chukwuneke for their immense contributions to this work. Our gratitude also goes to all the primary school head teachers in the study area for their open and honest co-operation.

References

Adia, K. 2010, March 07. "The Rot in Nigerian Private Schools." e-Tribune. Retrieved March, 26, 2010.<http://www.tribune.com.ng/sun/index.php/the-polity/470-the-rot-in-nigerian-private-schools>

Akani, N.A. "The Effect of a Short-Term Training of Head Teachers on the Implementation of School Health Program in Primary Schools in Obio/Akpor Local Government Area." 1997. Doctoral Dissertation. Medical College of Nigeria, 1997).

Ebong, R.D. 1994. "Environmental Health Knowledge and Practice Survey among Secondary School Children in Zaria, Nigeria." Environmental Health Perspectives 102(3): 310–2.

Ejieh, M.U.C. 2009. The Universal Basic Education as an Effective Strategy for Meeting the Millennium Development Goals in Nigeria. Nebula 6(1): 112–21.

Ekpo, U.F., S.N. Odoemene, C.F. Mafian and S.O. Sam-Wobo. 2008. "Helminths and Hygiene Conditions of Schools in Ikenne, Ogun State, Nigeria." PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 2(1): e146.

Kamaruddin, R., N. Zainal and Z. Aminuddin. 2009 "The Quality of Learning Environment and Academic Performance from a Student's Perspective." International Journal of Business and Management 4(4): 171–5.

Majra, J.P., and A. Gur. 2010. "School Environment and Sanitation in Rural India." Journal of Global Infectious Diseases 2(2): 109–11.

Marx E. and S.F. Wooley, eds. 1998. Health Is Academic. A Guide to Coordinated School Health Programs. New York: Teachers College Press.

Murray, N.G., B.J. Low, C. Hollis, A.W. Cross and S.M. Davis. 2007. "Coordinated School Health Programs and Academic Achievement: A Systematic Review of the Literature." Journal of School Health 77(9): 589–600.

Nwana, O.C. 1998. "Implications of Primary Health Care for School Health Programme." Nigerian School Health Journal 7(1): 21–5.

Ofovwe, G.E. and A.N. Ofili. "Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of School Health Programme among Head Teachers of Primary Schools in Egor Local Government Area of Edo State, Nigeria." Annals of African Medicine vol. 6, No. 3; 2007: 99 – 103.

Ogaji, D. 2006. "Quality Assessment of Secondary School Health Program." Doctoral Dissertation. Medical College of Nigeria, 2006

Oluyole, F. 2010, February 15. "Impact of Sanitation in Survival." Daily Triumph R/AUWAL 1 1451 A.H. Retrieved March 26, 2010.<http://washlink.wordpress.com/2010/02/16/impact-of-sanitation-on-survival/>.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this!

Related Articles

Note: Please enter a display name. Your email address will not be publically displayed