Healthcare in Ontario - and across Canada - is at a crossroads. On one hand, we are navigating immense pressures: an aging population, staff burnout that still reverberates from the pandemic, ongoing human resources crises, funding challenges, and the legacy fragmentation of our healthcare systems. On the other hand, we stand at the edge of unprecedented opportunity. Advances in technology - from virtual reality experiments in dementia care, to AI applications in diagnostics, to remote monitoring devices - are reshaping the contours of care at a pace we have never experienced before.

This convergence of demographic stressors and technological acceleration demands more than just new policies and systems. It demands clarity, coherence, and nuance in how we understand, explain, and integrate change. And this is where communications - so often seen as an afterthought to policy - must be recognized as a strategic tool at the heart of policy development.

Communications as Strategy, Not Just Output

Traditionally, communications has been positioned as the end stage of the policy process: once a decision is made or a program is finalized, communicators are brought in to “get the message out.” This linear model has never been sufficient, but it’s especially lacking in a period of seismic shifts. The effectiveness of policy depends not only on the soundness of its design, but also on how it resonates with diverse stakeholders - clinicians, patients, caregivers, and the broader public.

If communication considerations are left to the very end, we risk rolling out technically strong but socially fragile policies. We risk alienating already stressed workers or confusing populations already overwhelmed by rapid technological change. Instead, communications must be woven into policy from the start, shaping both the process and the product.

Communications professionals are, by training and practice, interdisciplinary thinkers. They toggle between big-picture vision and detail-oriented execution. They are attuned not only to what is being said, but how it will be received, interpreted, and acted upon. In the current healthcare landscape, this skillset is central.

Consider:

• Clarity in complexity. As AI, VR, and other emerging technologies enter care settings, the concepts and implications can be opaque. Communicators can distill these developments into accessible narratives without oversimplifying.
• Managing adaptation. Change in healthcare is disruptive. For an aging society under stress, adaptation requires careful framing and reassurance. Communications can reduce resistance by building understanding, trust, and readiness.
• Building collaboration. Policy change in healthcare often cuts across silos -between providers, sectors, and systems. Communicators are natural connectors, able to craft language and processes that foster alignment across diverse groups.

Failing to integrate communications into policy design is not a neutral omission. It creates tangible risks, including erosion of trust when announcements feel top-down or disconnected from frontline realities; policy failure when uptake falters because stakeholders don’t see themselves in the vision; and public confusion when the pace of change outstrips the clarity of explanations.

Simply put, a policy poorly communicated can stall, regardless of its merits.

Toward a Communications-Savvy Policy Culture

What does it look like to integrate communications into policy culture? It starts with reframing communicators as strategic partners, not service providers. Their role is not just to “translate” finalized policy, but to help shape the very questions being asked and the scenarios being considered.

• Policy tables should always have a communications seat. Communicators at the table will ask important questions: how will this land? What are the risks of misunderstanding? Where are the pressure points?
• Language must be treated as infrastructure. Just as we debate funding models or delivery systems, we must also debate how language frames the change we seek.
• Clarity and nuance must co-exist. Oversimplification breeds mistrust, while jargon alienates. Striking the right balance requires skilled communicators.

A Call to Action

Communications is the connective tissue that allows policy to move from paper into practice, from debate into daily life. It sustains trust, galvanizes uptake, and ensures that rapid shifts become part of the system rather than points of friction. If we want effective change, policy must be communications-savvy from the start—treating clarity as seriously as technical soundness, and nuance as seriously as innovation.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this!