Healthcare Quarterly

Healthcare Quarterly 8(2) March 2005 : 28-29.doi:10.12927/hcq..17054
Departments

CIHI Survey: More Scans, More Scanners

Gilles Fortin, Jennifer Zelmer and Kira Leeb

Abstract

In 2003, about two million Canadians aged 15 and over reported having had a non-emergency MRI, CT or angiography in the past year (Statistics Canada 2003). That's up 25% since 2001.
These scans were delivered by more machines than ever before. By the beginning of 2004, Canada had 338 CT scanners, up 44% from a decade earlier (Canadian Institute for Health Information 2004). The number of MRI machines grew by almost four times over the same period, from 40 to 151 scanners. (See Figure 1.)

Despite these increases, Canada continues to rank below the midpoint among member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for the number of MRI scanners and CT scanners per million population. For example, Canada ranked 13th among the 20 OECD countries reporting MRI data for the latest year comparable data were available. However, having more machines does not necessarily mean that more people receive imaging services. Manitoba, for example, had about 2.6 MRI scanners per million population in 2001, half the number England reported. Yet the province reported a higher scan rate - 17 scans per 1,000 people in 2001-02, compared to 14 in England (Canadian Institute for Health Information 2003). (Given that Manitoba's definition of scans is narrower than England's, this comparison likely underestimates the difference in scan rates.) This example illustrates that a wide range of factors may explain the variations in international supply and utilization patterns for medical imaging services and technologies.

Where Do Scans Take Place?

Many imaging facilities are located in hospitals, but there is also a well-established tradition in Canada of free-standing imaging facilities, which may be for- or not-for-profit. These facilities range from specialized services run by physicians, radiologists, dentists, chiropractors or mammography programs to broad-based imaging centres offering a wide range of tests. In 2003, 96% of Canadians who received a CT scan and 90% of those who had an MRI said that their test took place in a hospital or public clinic (Statistics Canada 2003).

Regardless of the type of facility in which the test occurs, funding can come from a variety of sources. Who pays can depend on many factors, such as why the test is needed, what type of exam is performed and where the facility is located. Hospitals with CT and MRI scanners reported that the vast majority of their operating funding came through provincial or territorial governments. In free-standing facilities, however, private health insurance, other private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments were the leading source of operating revenue. (See Figure 2.)

Basic X-Ray Exams: Still Most Common Medical Imaging Procedure

The World Health Organization suggests that diagnostic imaging is needed, as clinical considerations alone are insufficient to make a correct diagnosis, in 20% to 30% of medical cases worldwide (World Health Organization 2003). They suggest that some 80% to 90% of these diagnostic problems can generally be solved using "basic" x-ray and/or ultrasound examinations.

The range of services provided in Ontario hospitals (the only province for which comprehensive data were available) is close to this mark. Seventy-nine percent of medical imaging examinations, excluding angiography studies, were x-rays or ultrasounds in 2002-03 (Canadian Institute for Health Information 2004). According to CIHI's Canadian MIS Database (CMDB), in 2002-03, hospitals in Ontario spent about $316 million on X-rays alone. (See Figure 3)

A range of imaging professionals are involved in delivering services across the country. Their numbers have remained relatively stable in recent years. In 2003, for example, the rate of medical radiation technologists was 49 per 100,000 population compared to 47 in 2002. There were no changes in the rates of medical physicists and diagnostic radiology physicians: one and six per 100,000 respectively.

Medical Imaging in Canada 2004, CIHI's latest report on diagnostic imaging, incorporates results from the 2004 National Survey of Selected Medical Imaging Equipment and includes a more comprehensive look at the distribution and cost of selected medical imaging technologies and services, how long Canadians are waiting for services, medial imaging human resources in Canada and other issues.

About the Author(s)

Gilles Fortin, Senior Researcher at the Canadian Institute for Health Information, is the principal author of the report Medical Imaging in Canada 2004. Since joining CIHI in 1995, after many years at Health Canada, he also participated in the production of reports on other aspects of Canada's healthcare system, particularly national health accounts.

Jennifer Zelmer is Vice-President, Research and Analysis for the Canadian Institute for Health Information. In this role, she leads an integrated program of health services and population health-related analytical and research initiatives.

Kira Leeb Since coming to CIHI, Kira Leeb has managed the production of CIHI's annual report on the health of Canada's healthcare system. She has also led or participated in the production of more focused reports on aspects of Canada's healthcare system.

References

Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2003. Medical Imaging in Canada. Ottawa: Author.

Canadian Institute for Health Information. 2004. Medical Imaging in Canada. Ottawa: Author.

Statistics Canada. 2003. Health Services Access Survey. Ottawa: Author.

World Health Organization. 2003. Essential Diagnostic Imaging. World Health Organization, Department of Essential Health Technologies. Retrieved January 22, 2005. http://www.who.int/bct/EHTadvfolder/finaldesing/DiagnosticImaging.pdf.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this!

Note: Please enter a display name. Your email address will not be publically displayed