Healthcare Quarterly
Health Quality 5.0: The Counterforce in Advancing Integrated Care – Our Path to Transformation
Abstract
Fragmented care remains a critical issue in health systems, leading to significant gaps and poor outcomes. This article highlights real-world consequences and the inefficacy of current patchwork solutions, exposing the gap between policy intent and practical impact. An urgent shift to integrated, people-centred care is needed, embracing social determinants of health, learning health systems and collective leadership. While pockets of excellence exist, sustainable transformation requires valuing and investing in the counterforce: co-creation, relational reciprocity and radical collaboration. This is our path to transformation – supporting the necessary conditions and capabilities for whole systems change.
Addressing Fragmented Care Is Long Overdue
Fragmented care has been a standing focus of the quality agenda for decades, yet it continues to persist in every corner of the health ecosystem, leaving profound gaps (CIHI n.d.; IOM 2001; Starfield et al. 2005).
This is not a theoretical problem; we know this because of the countless stories that serve as undeniable evidence that our systems are not working: an aging parent navigating multiple care providers to manage a chronic illness while their caregiver struggles with isolation; a youth left with no access to critical mental health services not knowing where to turn without disposable income to pay for private care; a person you pass on the street facing precarious housing and unmet palliative care needs, without the basic dignity of food security.
Everyone has a story – whether personal or one you have witnessed – where the impact of fragmented care has led to significant consequences. People working within our systems often go to heroic efforts to fill in the gaps with patchwork solutions and workarounds to make things work for patients. This approach is neither effective nor sustainable.
This is the everyday consequence of a disjointed array of healthcare and social care providers within our systems, which are not built for connection or for supporting all the social determinants that make people healthy – those factors that are necessary to improve well-being and population health (Bell et al. 2023; Varner et al. 2024).
The Healthcare Quarterly series on the future of quality, “It Is Time for Health Quality 5.0: Are You Ready?”, has identified fragmented care as one of the most pressing problems for health systems around the world (Thompson 2023). I note that when combined with other major challenges such as the workforce crisis and the lack of co-creation, the consequences of not addressing fragmented care are amplified (Thompson 2024a, 2024b). Advancing integrated care cannot exist in a vacuum.
The lack of integration reverberates at every level, affecting individuals, families and communities – at best resulting in poor experiences and at worst, causing physical and mental harm.
Reflecting on the Global Momentum Toward Integrated Care
We have known for decades that our outdated, transactional and medically focused health systems are inadequate to meet the needs of people and communities (CMA 2010).
In 2024, Canada marked the 50th anniversary of “A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians,” in which Canadian minister of national health and welfare, Marc Lalonde, highlighted the profound impact of social factors, such as housing, food security and social connection, on health and well-being (Lalonde 1974).
Since its release, both the Canadian and the global population have doubled, and calls to advance integrated care and population health have echoed worldwide (Stein et al. 2022). Of particular significance in Canada was the 2000 publication “Towards a Canadian Model of Integrated Healthcare” by Peggy Leatt, George H. Pink and Michael Guerriere, marking a pivotal moment – 25 years ago (Leatt et al. 2000). Over the past decades, many of us around the world have started down a path to transformation, embracing innovation, reimaging the systems, structures and mindsets that define healthcare today and implementing various initiatives, advancing us toward the quintuple aim (Nundy et al. 2022).
As the first article in the Quality 5.0 series highlights, it is imperative that we adopt a learning health systems approach to generate and translate this high-quality evidence into practice to advance integrated care and population health (Reid et al. 2024; Thompson 2023). This approach enables continuous improvement and scaling of initiatives, continually growing and refining the evidence related to the why, what and how to advance integrated people-centred care. This evidence speaks to the increasing momentum and traction of various approaches in both strategic, top-down initiatives and community-driven, bottom-up innovations (Wodchis et al. 2020).
To meet the escalating needs, we have seen the emergence of new roles in the health system, such as patient and system navigators and peer support workers, all designed to help individuals to navigate complex systems and connect seamlessly to the health and social services they need (Dumbrell et al. 2024).
Strengthening primary healthcare, social medicine and social prescribing is emerging as a top priority in many health systems, now recognized as fundamental to advancing integrated care and population health (Scarpetti et al. 2024). The purpose is to better integrate social determinants of health into care delivery. The increase in models of team-based care through primary care networks, such as in the movement seen in Canada, as well as increased neighbourhood approaches to care, such as in the Netherlands, aim to better partner care delivery with community organizations, public health and social services to improve outcomes; they are investing in upstream care delivery through health promotion, disease prevention, chronic disease management and population health management (Bosdijk et al. 2023; Philpott 2024).
We have also seen an increase in policy-led or place-based integrated care initiatives that cross all levels of the health system. These initiatives are created with the intent to establish shared governance and accountability to improve health and well-being outcomes, such as in the integrated care systems in England (Miller et al. 2021).
Together, these examples show how innovation, collaboration and commitment to shared goals are driving meaningful progress in integrated care. Despite these global efforts, we have yet to see real progress on the scale and sustainability of change.
These pockets of excellence remain just that – isolated pockets. This is not our sustainable operating model for achieving whole systems transformation.
Why Is Progress So Hard?
In our experience with systems change, two forces consistently grapple for dominance: the status quo and its counterforce.
The status quo keeps systems stagnant by maintaining our approaches for change that fail to achieve the transformational and sustainable outcomes we seek.
All too often, we default to focusing on structure, the constant reorganization of our health systems within their existing frameworks, believing that tinkering with structure will yield lasting improvements, or similarly, implementing incomplete or isolated policies or pilots and neglecting the relational and sustainable components needed for whole systems transformation.
Maintaining the status quo of pulling on the same levers of change leaves us in this oxymoron reality where things are constantly changing, yet nothing is changing at all. The overwhelming administrative tasks involved in implementing change make it even more complex, often preventing the achievement of intended outcomes. People are so focused on present urgent priorities that shared purpose is overshadowed or even lost. This is a complete disregard for the people-centred care principles we all aim to uphold.
A clear vision, and certainly the lack of a clear vision, does not provide a clear path, exposing a persistent gap between policy intent and practical impact. Leaders are caught in the present urgency and the time and resources needed to address today's crisis that foresight and reflection on sustainable change are lost.
The counterforce challenges the status quo – it questions, disrupts and reimagines. It champions enabling the conditions and capability we need for transformation, reinforcing the power of social capital: trust, relationships and belonging (Lee and Buhlman 2024). This approach values co-creation, relational reciprocity (Reiss-Brennan 2024) and radical collaboration, understanding that sustainable change emerges from shared purpose, collective leadership and equal partnership.
We witness this tension between the status quo response and the counterforce play out in boardrooms, policy-making circles, leadership committees and on the front lines of care. The stakes in this tension are high. The status quo cannot withstand today's population health crises and social injustices that persist in our communities. Without real change that enables collective progress toward improved outcomes, health systems risk collapsing under the weight of chaos.
How might we shift from an overemphasis on present activities and start to value and prioritize the counterforce? Imagine if enabling the conditions for transformation through collaboration, capability building and relational approaches became our standard way of operating.
So, What Is Coming? The Catalyst for Transformation
Bowie's “Tomorrow Belongs to Those Who Hear It Coming” (1977) reflects the notion that collective foresight and action are the powers we share to shape the path forward.
The call for integrated care has never been more urgent. Transformation requires more than intention or isolated initiatives – it demands bold action and collective leadership (Stein et al. 2021).
Our collective leadership and collaboration can break the cycle of reinventing the wheel each time an integrated care solution is needed, reinforcing the value to leverage, complement and adapt existing approaches and resources that build on decades of lived experience and evidence. This radical collaboration enhances our capability to learn and unlearn together for transformation – intentionally choosing partnerships over competition, optimizing not duplicating, for collective impact. This notion of shifting from ego to ecocentric is a reorientation from the context of our jobs or our organizations to the entire ecosystem and, fundamentally, the people and communities we serve.
The question is, how do we unlock this potential?
In Canada, we have high-quality assets at our fingertips that have been created to help close the transformation chasm. Taken together, they are powerful enablers for change. First, we need to increase awareness of what is already happening across these and help to ensure that people do not waste time, energy and resources reinventing the wheel. Second, we can all go further and faster if these initiatives converge. Convergence will not happen naturally, but when leaders of these national initiatives come together, the roles that each play can be amplified and collective impact achieved. With this also comes momentum, learning at scale and inspiring conditions for others to join the movement.
Let us look at a few outstanding Canadian assets that we think can be leveraged to advance integrated, people-centred care in new and exciting ways (Table 1).
TABLE 1. Key Canadian assets for advancing integrated, people-centred care | |||
Year | Asset | Purpose | Source |
2020 | The International Foundation of Integrated Care (IFIC) Canada |
|
IFIC (n.d.a) |
2021 | CAN/Health Standards Organization (HSO) Integrated People-Centred Health Systems National Standard of Canada |
|
HSO (2021) WHO (2016) IFIC (n.d.b, n.d.c) |
2024 | The Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Transforming Health with Integrated Care (THINC) research initiative |
|
CIHR (2024) |
2024 | Network for Integrated Care Excellence (NICE), funded by CIHR, partners with the North American Centre for Integrated Care and IFIC Canada |
|
University of Toronto (n.d.) |
2024 | North American Conference on Integrated Care (NACIC) hosted by IFIC Canada |
|
IFIC (2024) |
Various | This table is not an exhaustive list – other initiatives across the country are advancing integrated care |
|
Various |
Note: This is not an exhaustive list but an example of the possibility of where to align opportunities for coordinated national impact. |
We believe in the power of evidence, standards and collective learning to drive change. Health Standards Organization (HSO) standards are updated on a regular cadence, which provides an opportunity to incorporate what we have learned from the International Foundation of Integrated Care (IFIC) Canada, the emerging evidence from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) project and the experience from people around the world who are using the standard to transform their health systems. This is but one example of the power of convergence that can unlock the potential for us to activate transformation in real and meaningful ways.
Taking these first steps in establishing these assets to enable the agenda for change was necessary. While we have made progress, we know from learnings thus far that the fully enabled environment is needed for the transformational power we seek and we also know that the counterforce is lacking. Herein lies the opportunity and leverage point for convergence. The opportunity for collective impact.
Just imagine the possibilities if we converge and invest in connecting, adapting and sharing learnings across assets. Only by working together in this way can we achieve the meaningful transformation we all aspire to.
Imagining and patterning for our possible future
Through collective leadership, we can set a clear vision, develop realistic plans, measure progress, learn our way forward and celebrate successes together. This counterforce – co-creation, relational reciprocity and radical collaboration – is essential for transformation. It requires time, effort and commitment as the currency for change. Success depends on embedding these capabilities into the transformation agenda, ensuring that they are valued and credible alongside technical and structural components (Fooks et al. 2018).
There is a need for deeper expressions of accountability and deliberate action if we are to drive meaningful change or risk defaulting to the status quo.
What if we make a bold commitment today to embrace and uphold this counterforce, just imagine the possibilities of our future:
- Just imagine no strategic plan exists without alignment across organizational and community partners through co-creation, embracing shared purpose and priorities.
- Just imagine municipalities, public health and healthcare and social care organizations radically collaborating, aligned by shared goals and collective accountability to advance community well-being.
- Just imagine learning and leadership opportunities are no longer isolated but integrated across education programs, services, organizations and sectors, unleashing the transformative power of collective learning and unlearning, capability building and system leadership.
- Just imagine standards as dynamic and adaptive mechanisms, evolving as enablers of shared accountability, innovation and transformation across the health ecosystem.
- Just imagine health systems and industry partners working together in equal partnership with communities to bring about sustainable transformation through innovation and collaboration.
- Just imagine people's and communities' needs are not only met but their health and well-being flourish through inclusivity, co-creation and investment in community-led initiatives. Community partners and service organizations know each other and are designed to connect and interoperate.
This shift from the status quo to the possibility of our future reorients us all from an organization-centric to a people- and community-centric perspective. However, this shift requires more than the will of people; it demands tangible investment and action from everyone.
Just imagine a chief transformation officer or office with the soul of its mission and mandate to support the enabling conditions and build the capabilities that allow this to become the new way we operate – closing the chasm between what policy is intended to do and what actually happens on the ground, connecting across through shared purpose, collective leadership and mobilizing people as part of a movement for change (Evans et al. 2016). The counterforce presents a path of possibility and opportunity. It reimagines systems as ecosystems of connection, rooted in trust and relationships – elements as vital to transformation as any technical solution.
Taking Control of What Is Ours to Change
As leaders, opting out of the quality and transformation agenda is not an option; in fact, it is ours to enable. Bold leadership is necessary to create integrated and population health systems that serve all. It is essential to our collective future, and our actions must reflect that urgency.
In our journey, we have learned that change happens at the speed of trust. Our job now is to create deliberate spaces for co-creation, relational reciprocity and radical collaboration. Each of us holds a piece of the puzzle; no single organization can achieve meaningful progress alone. The challenge is in how we create the enabling environment and capability to bring the pieces together to form a cohesive whole.
This is of utmost importance. Not only is advancing integrated care and population health critical for the health and well-being of people and communities, but health is also a socio-political issue necessary to tackle the broader challenges we face today (Russell 2018). We must now name these challenges and bring them from the periphery into the mainstream.
The Quality 5.0 series names these broader societal challenges – climate change; equity; workforce crisis; safety; and fragmented care – which threaten our opportunity to flourish (Thompson 2023). Progress will lag if we continue to view these issues individually or in isolation – in fact, we cannot meaningfully address them unless we do so collectively.
Upholding the health and well-being of people and communities and advancing health for all is relevant no matter what the issue is – our strength is in connection and community.
Everybody has a story. Now is the time to unite our stories across the health ecosystem and mobilize a collective movement and path to transformation. Stay tuned for more conversations to be had.
About the Author(s)
Leslee J. Thompson, BScN, MScN, MBA, ICD, is the chief executive officer at Health Standards Organization and Accreditation Canada in Ottawa, ON. She works as an executive-in-residence at the Rotman School of Management at the University of Toronto in Toronto, ON, and focuses on strategy and change leadership. A passionate champion of people-centred care, Leslee began her career as an intensive care unit nurse and has 30 years of experience as a senior executive in hospitals, health systems, the government and a global MedTech company. She has served on multiple public and private sector boards, including the International Society for Quality in Health Care. Leslee can be reached by e-mail at leslee.thompson@healthstandards.org.
Jodeme Goldhar, MSW, MHSc is the founder and managing director of 4C Impact Ltd. and a recognized leader in systems-level transformation in health and social care. Along with Walter Wodchis, she is the co-director for the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC) Canada, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, and the vice-chair at IFIC Board of Directors in Toronto, ON. Jodeme is the co-director of the National Health Fellows Programs at the Health Leadership Academy, McMaster University, and her contributions to integrated care and transformative solutions have earned her numerous accolades, including the Top Ten Women Changing Health Care in Canada, National Catalyst for Change Award, Chambers of Commerce and two Ontario ministers of health medals.
Acknowledgment
The authors express their deep appreciation to Samantha Laxton, whose expertise was instrumental in bringing this article to fruition.
The authors thank Walter Wodchis for his review and insights into the article's final product.
References
Bell, B., G. Black, J. Butts, V. Goel, A. Lafontaine, V. Lee et al. 2023, January. Taking Back Health Care: How To Accelerate People-Centred Reform Now. Public Policy Forum. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://ppforum.ca/publications/taking-back- health-care/>.
Bosdijk, A., A.P. Nieboer and J.M. Cramm. 2023. The Development of an Integrated Neighborhood Approach for Health Promotion and Prevention: A Qualitative Exploration of Stakeholders' Views. Health Research Policy and Systems 21(1): 125. doi:10.1186/s12961-023-01077-4.
Bowie, D. 1977. Tomorrow Belongs to Those Who Can Hear It Coming [Song]: Heroes. RCA Records.
Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). n.d. Strengthening Canada's Health Care Systems With Data-Driven Insights. Retrieved October 24, 2024. <https://www.cihi.ca/en/taking-the-pulse-measuring-shared-priorities-for-canadian-health-care-2024/strengthening-canadas-health-care-systems-with-data-driven-insights>.
Canadian Medical Association (CMA). 2010, July 13. Health Care Transformation in Canada: Change That Works, Care That Lasts. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://policybase.cma.ca/media/PolicyPDF/PD10-05.pdf>.
Dumbrell, J., H. Carver, R. Foster, B. Pauly, W. Steele, M. Roy et al. 2024. Navigating Transitions Into, Through, and Beyond Peer Worker Roles: Insider Insights From the Supporting Harm Reduction Through Peer Support (SHARPS) Study. Harm Reduction Journal 21: 191. doi:10.1186/s12954-024-01109-4.
Evans, J., S. Daub, J. Goldhar, A. Wojtak and D. Purbhoo. 2016. Leading Integrated Health and Social Care Systems: Perspectives From Research and Practice. Healthcare Quarterly 18(4): 30–35. doi:10.12927/hcq.2016.24553.
Fooks, C., J. Goldhar, W.P. Wodchis, G.R. Baker and J. Coutts. 2018. Effective Approaches to Integrating Care: A Three-Part Series. Healthcare Quarterly 21(2): 18–22. doi:10.12927/hcq.2018.25627.
Health Standards Organization (HSO). 2021. CAN/HSO 76000:2021 – Integrated People-Centred Health Systems. Retrieved October 24, 2024. <https://healthstandards.org/integratedcare/>.
Institute of Medicine (IOM). 2001. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press.
International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC). 2024. NACIC24: The North American Conference on Integrated Care. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://integratedcarefoundation.org/events/nacic24- north-america-conference-on-integrated-care-calgary-canada>.
International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC). n.d.a. IFIC Canada. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://integratedcarefoundation.org/ific_hub/ific-canada>.
International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC). n.d.b. The Nine Pillars of Integrated Care. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://integratedcarefoundation.org/nine-pillars-of-integrated-care>.
International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC). n.d.c. Knowledge Tree. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://integratedcarefoundation.org/the-knowledge-tree>.
Lalonde, M. 1974, April. A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians: A Working Document. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ph-sp/pdf/perspect-eng.pdf>.
Lee, T.H. and N. Buhlman. 2024, August 9. The Strongest U.S. Healthcare Organizations Invest in Social Capital. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://hbr.org/2024/08/the-strongest-u-s-healthcare-organizations-invest-in-social-capital>.
Leatt, P., G.H. Pink and M. Guerriere. 2000. Towards a Canadian Model of Integrated Healthcare. Healthcare Papers 1(2): 13–35. doi:10.12927/hcpap..17216.
Miller, R., J. Glasby and H. Dickinson. 2021. Integrated Health and Social Care in England: Ten Years on. International Journal of Integrated Care 21(S2): 6. doi:10.5334/ijic.5666.
Nundy S, Cooper LA, Mate KS. 2022. The Quintuple Aim for Health Care Improvement: A New Imperative to Advance Health Equity. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. Retrieved March 26, 2025. <https://www.ihi.org/resources/publications/quintuple-aim- health-care-improvement-new-imperative-advance-health-equity>.
Philpott, J. 2024. Health for All: A Doctor's Prescription for a Healthier Canada. Signal.
Reid, R.J., W.P. Wodchis, K. Kuluski, N.K. Lee-Foon, J. Lavis, L.C. Rosella et al. 2024. Actioning the Learning Health System: An Applied Framework for Integrating Research Into Health Systems. SSM – Health Systems 2: 100010. doi:10.1016/j.ssmhs.2024.100010.
Reiss-Brennan, B. 2024, November 13. Navigating Complexity in Healthcare: Building Trust Through Relational Reciprocity. International Foundation for Integrated Care. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://integratedcarefoundation.org/blog/navigating-complexity-in-healthcare- building-trust-through-relational-reciprocity>.
Russell, C. 2018. We Don't Have a Health Problem, We Have a Village Problem. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://www.nurturedevelopment.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/we-dont-have-a-health-problem-we-have-a-village-problem8259.pdf>.
Scarpetti, G., H. Shadowen, G.A. Williams, J. Winkelmann, M. Kroneman, P.P. Groenewegen et al. 2024. A Comparison of Social Prescribing Approaches Across Twelve High-Income Countries. Health Policy 142: 104992. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992.
Starfield, B., L. Shi and J. Macinko. 2005. Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health. The Milbank Quarterly 83(3): 457–502. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.
Stein, K.V., R. Miller, E. Aldasoro and N. Goodwin. 2022. Always Look on the Bright Side – Lessons Learned from Another Decade of Integrating Care. International Journal of Integrated Care, 22(4): 15. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7513.
Stein, V., R. Miller, J. Godhar and A. Wojtak. 2021. Reflections in a time of crisis: What it takes to manage and lead integrated systems of care. Insights. Longwoods Publishing.
Thompson, L. 2023. It Is Time for Health Quality 5.0: Are You Ready? Healthcare Quarterly 26(3): 27–30. doi:10.12927/hcq.2023.27218.
Thompson, L. 2024a. Health Quality 5.0: The Global Health Workforce Crisis – First Things First. Healthcare Quarterly 26(4): 17-23. doi:10.12927/hcq.2024.27258.
Thompson, L. 2024b. Health Quality 5.0: What Does Co-Creation Have to Do With It? Healthcare Quarterly 27(2): 50-55.doi:10.12927/hcq.2024.27430.
University of Toronto. n.d. Network for Integrated Care Excellence (NICE): A Knowledge Mobilization and Impact Hub for the THINC Initiative. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://nacic.dlsph.utoronto.ca/nice/>.
Varner, C., A. Boozary and A. Laupacis. 2024. “Social Admissions” to Hospital Are Not Personal Failures but Policy Ones. CMAJ 196(17): E597–98. doi:10.1503/cmaj.240577.
Wodchis, W.P., J. Shaw, S. Sinha, O. Bhattacharyya, S. Shahid and G. Anderson. 2020. Innovative Policy Supports for Integrated Health and Social Care Programs in High-Income Countries. Health Affairs 39(4): 697–703. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01587.
World Health Organization (WHO). 2016, April 15. Framework on Integrated, People-Centred Health Services. Retrieved January 18, 2025. <https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/wha69/a69_39-en.pdf>.
Comments
Be the first to comment on this!
Personal Subscriber? Sign In
Note: Please enter a display name. Your email address will not be publically displayed